Risk factors for infection in fixation of distal tibia fractures.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to evaluate risk factors for infection as well as infection rates after open reduction and internal fixation for distal tibia fractures with a distal tibia locking plate and/or isolated screws. METHODS: This is a retrospective and descriptive study based on 55 patients treated in our Major Trauma Centre from January 2009 to December 2016. All patients were classified by age, sex, open or closed fracture, injury mechanism, comorbidities, fixation and time from injury to surgery. 22 extraarticular fractures AO/OTA 43-A and 33 intraarticular (14 cases 43-B and 19 43-C) were recorded. High energy trauma was related in 27 patients, while open fractures were observed in 10 patients. Splint until surgery was applied routinely while temporary external fixation (EF) was performed in 21 patients (7 extraarticular and 14 intraarticular). Patients were treated by 5 different consultant surgeons performing isolated screws (SC) in 20% of the surgeries, antero-medial locking distal tibia plate (AM) and anterolateral (AL) were used in 47% and 33% of the patients respectively. After assessing normality and homogeneity of the subgroups, statistical contrast tests were performed. RESULTS: Infection rate was 31.5%, mainly caused by S. aureus. We obtained a statistically significant correlation between greater age and infection rate. In the same way, a positive statistical trend between infection and AL plating was found. The use of EF followed by ORIF was not observed as a risk factor for infection compared with splint followed by internal fixation, however, the group of patients in which a splint was used, a positive relationship was found between the infection rate and shorter time until the definitive fixation. No statistically significant associations were found between extra/intraarticular fracture pattern, use of corticosteroids or open fractures and infection rate. CONCLUSION: Greater age was a predisposing factor for infection. The use of external fixation before definitive ORIF seems to be a safe procedure regarding risk infection, and if an external fixation is not used, we recommend longer waiting time until definitive ORIF. Screw fixation or antero-medial plates, if allowed by fracture pattern, can be an option to avoid infection.

Development of trauma systems in Europe-reports from England, Germany, the Netherlands, and Spain.

Major trauma systems have evolved in many European countries and have resulted in improved care in terms of mortality and morbidity. Many of the systems have similar history, with reports of either poor services, or a single disaster, driving change of policy and set up. We report on 4 European systems, looking at the background, set up and some of the results. Similar issues are identified including the importance of triage, the concentration of specialist skills which require patients to bypass hospitals, and the standardization of treatment protocols. The issues of rehabilitation and the increasing importance of measuring outcome with patient reported metrics are discussed.

Comparison of outcome of tibial plafond fractures managed by hybrid external fixation versus two-stage management with final plate fixation.

BACKGROUND: Tibial platfond fractures are usually associated with massive swelling of the foot and ankle, as well as with open wounds. This swelling may cause significant decrease of the blood flow, so the state of the soft tissue is determinant for the surgical indication and the type of implant. This retrospective study compares the union times in cases of tibial plafond fractures managed with a hybrid external fixation as a definitive procedure versus those managed with a two stage strategy with final plate fixation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study in a polytrauma referral hospital was performed between 2005 and 2011. Patients with a tibial plafond fracture, managed with a hybrid external fixation as a definitive procedure or managed with a two stage strategy with the final plate fixation were included in the study. Postoperative radiographs were evaluated by two senior surgeons. Fracture healing was defined as callus bridging of one cortex, seen on both lateral and anteroposterior X-ray. The clinical outcome was evaluated by means of 11 points Numerical Rating Scale for pain and The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle score, assessed at the last followup visit. Thirteen patients had been managed with a hybrid external fixation and 18 with a two-stage strategy with the final plate fixation. There were 14 males and 17 females with a mean age of 48 years (range 19-82 years). The mean followup was 24 months (range 24-70 months). RESULTS: The mean time from surgery to weight bearing was 7 ± 6.36 days for the hybrid fixation group and 57.43 ± 15.46 days for the plate fixation group (P < 0.0001); and the mean time from fracture to radiological union was 133.82 ± 37.83) and 152.8 ± 72.33 days respectively (P = 0.560). CONCLUSION: Besides the differences between groups regarding the baseline characteristics of patients, the results of this study suggest that in cases of tibial plafond fractures, the management with a hybrid external fixation as a definitive procedure might involve a faster union than a two-stage management with final plate fixation.